Case Details Case Title: Kanhai & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh Court: Allahabad High Court Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 1470 of 1987 Date Reserved: 06 July 2026 Date Delivered: 29 July 2026 Neutral Citation: Not Assigned Coram: Hon’ble Justice Santosh Rai Background of the Case The prosecution alleged that on 21 February 1985, […]
Case Details Case Title: Directorate of Enforcement v. Poonam Malik Case No.: Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s). 25221 of 2026 Date of Judgment: 31 July 2026 Coram: Impugned Judgment: Delhi High Court A Major Relief Against Arbitrary ED Action In an important judgment protecting the constitutional rights of citizens, the Supreme Court has affirmed
The Supreme Court settles an important procedural question: When a Sessions Court reverses an acquittal and convicts an accused in appeal, the remedy is Revision—not another Appeal. Case Details Case Title: Vishnu Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Another Case No.: Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 13891 of 2025 Citation: 2026 INSC (Citation
Case Title: Khalil Pasha & Ors. v. Abdul Rasheed & Anr. Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 754 Case No.: Criminal Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 1115 of 2023 Date of Judgment: 28 July 2026 Bench: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran Can Someone Be Convicted Simply Because the Crime Looks
Case Title: Archana Avinash Shelke v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Case No.: Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 2163 of 2025 Date of Judgment: 23 July 2026 Bench: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran Can Every Allegation Under the POCSO Act Lead to Trial? Supreme Court Says “No” The Supreme Court of India
Case Details Case Title: Lata v. Union of India & AnotherCase No.: Civil Appeal No. ____ of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 30726 of 2025)Date of Judgment: 17 July 2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay KarolCitation: Yet to be officially reported Introduction Have you ever booked a train ticket and noticed that your ticket
Case Details Case Title: Mani @ Subramaniyam v. State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of PoliceCourt: Supreme Court of IndiaCase No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3241 of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4516 of 2025)Date of Judgment: 17 July 2026Coram: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Vipul M. PancholiNeutral Citation: 2026 INSC 719Relevant Provisions: Sections
Case Title: Kumud Lall vs Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through LRs and Others ‘The Supreme Court clarifies whether legal heirs of a deceased doctor can be made liable in medical negligence cases under the Consumer Protection Act.‘ Medical negligence cases are often filed years after treatment. During this time, it is possible that the doctor
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment clarifying the evidentiary value of an accomplice’s testimony in criminal trials. The Court held that although courts generally seek corroboration of an approver’s statement, there is no absolute rule of law requiring independent corroboration in every case. If the testimony of the approver is found to be
