Case Details Case Title: Lata v. Union of India & AnotherCase No.: Civil Appeal No. ____ of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 30726 of 2025)Date of Judgment: 17 July 2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay KarolCitation: Yet to be officially reported Introduction Have you ever booked a train ticket and noticed that your ticket […]
Case Details Case Title: Mani @ Subramaniyam v. State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of PoliceCourt: Supreme Court of IndiaCase No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3241 of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4516 of 2025)Date of Judgment: 17 July 2026Coram: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Vipul M. PancholiNeutral Citation: 2026 INSC 719Relevant Provisions: Sections
Case Title: Kumud Lall vs Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through LRs and Others ‘The Supreme Court clarifies whether legal heirs of a deceased doctor can be made liable in medical negligence cases under the Consumer Protection Act.‘ Medical negligence cases are often filed years after treatment. During this time, it is possible that the doctor
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment clarifying the evidentiary value of an accomplice’s testimony in criminal trials. The Court held that although courts generally seek corroboration of an approver’s statement, there is no absolute rule of law requiring independent corroboration in every case. If the testimony of the approver is found to be
